|
13/03/2010
Dorset
League Division 2
Sturminster
Marshall Res 3 Dorchester Sports 1
|
Starting XI |
|
Stur Star Man:
Matt
Jones |
|
1 |
Matt Lambert |
|
|
|
2 |
Jack Geddes |
|
Goals: |
|
3 |
Tom Rudd |
|
Stur: Jones, S.Johnston, Mete (pen) |
|
4 |
Joe Wood |
|
|
|
5 |
Ciaran Miller |
|
|
|
6 |
Dave Johnston |
|
Substitutes |
|
7 |
Steve Johnston |
|
12 |
Dan Keane (for Hall 65) |
|
8 |
Erkan Mete |
|
14 |
Dan Pirie (for S.Johnston, 60) |
|
9 |
Matt Jones |
|
15 |
James Foster |
|
10 |
Luke Geddes |
|
|
|
|
11 |
Ryan Hall |
|
|
|
The Stur second
string maintained their lead at the top of the table after a hard fought win
over fourth placed Dorchester Sports.
Matt Jones gave
Stur the lead after 15 minutes when he headed home from close range following a
desperate goal mouth scramble. Dorchester drew level after 23 minutes when a
forward was given too much space in the inside left channel and smashed the ball
past stand-in keeper Matt Lambert.
Even at this early
stage, the home side had created enough chances to have the game won so the goal
was a real blow. To their credit the Stur players showed real character and, in
spite of the visitors undisguised efforts to intimidate them out of the game,
went straight back onto the offensive. They took the game by the scruff of the
neck and took a deserved lead when Steve Johnston hit a superb finish to round
off a superb move.
As half time
approached, Dorchester delivered a warning that they weren't finished yet and
Stur had Lambert to thank when he came off his line a saved bravely at the feet
of a Sports forward.
HT: 2-1
Stur kept their
grip on the game after the break and the positive approach was rewarded when Tom
Rudd sent Geddes clear in the box and he was unceremoniously brought down. Erkan
Mete waited whilst the arguments died down, refused to be put off by the
keeper's delaying tactics and coolly despatched the penalty.
There was only
going to be one winner from this point on. The stand-in Stur keeper hardly had
another save to make. If there was one disappointment it was that the obvious
superiority was not rammed home. It wasn't a great performance, but it would be
churlish to criticise the players after they showed such character to win three
tough points. |