|
View From The Churchill
FA
chief executive Brian Barwick has announced plans which are designed to improve
the behaviour of players, with one idea being to allow only captains to talk to
the referee. Barwick plans to introduce the rule at grass-roots level. Hmm. I
can understand that abuse of refs may have more impact at grass-roots because it
is a fact that personal abuse directed towards referees leads to many giving up
the game altogether and, as Barwick says, without referees games cannot take
place. It is also a fact that referees take more stick from spectators than they
do from players. When was the last time Mr Barwick stood on the touch line at an
under 8s fixture and witnessed the screaming banshees and raving madmen cheering
on their offspring?
I do think that
something has to be done to protect officials. Barwick’s proposals should
certainly be considered, but why plan to introduce this measure only at a lower
level? Why not take a big-bang approach and introduce it across the board? The
problem with introducing the measure at grass-roots level is that when it does
eventually reach the upper echelons of the game (if indeed it ever does) it
would be in such a watered down version that it would be completely ineffective.
After all, they wouldn’t want to upset anybody important would they?
It really is
time that the FA
looked at their flagship, the Premier League. Kids will copy their heroes - full
stop. Of course, the problem with the FA tackling
Premier League players is that as soon as they were touched, they would be
rolling about on the floor feigning injury, whilst their teammates brandish
invisible cards at the official.
Both codes of rugby
broadly work along the “only the captain can speak to the ref” principle and it
works well, but can the idea really take root in football? Not long ago, the
rules were changed to allow a free kick to be moved forward in the event of
abuse, yet how often do you see that happening now? Another case of a good idea
allowed to go soft by the FA. Just like the rugby-style mic-ing up of refs was
dropped once it was realised that the game’s heroes were not going to temper
their foul mouthed outpourings simply because a few hero worshipping children
could hear what they were saying.
The only way this will
work is if the punishment fits the crime. Abuse a match official – off. No
second chance, off. And the subsequent ban must be heavy enough to serve as a
deterrent. Maybe they could take a few pointers from the amateur game. If a
Sunday morning player is sent off, he cops for a 35 day ban. If the same
punishment was dished out to those involved in the professional game, the
Wengers and Fergusons of this world would soon instil a bit a discipline into
their players.
GK
|